If your child was harmed by a medical provider's failure during pregnancy, labor, or delivery, Florida law sets short deadlines and specific rules. Here's how to file and pursue your case.
If your child was harmed by a medical provider’s failure during pregnancy, labor, or delivery in Florida, you generally have two years from the date you discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the injury to bring a medical malpractice claim under Fla. Stat. § 95.11. For a child, a separate repose rule (discussed below) can widen that window, but the safe assumption is that the clock is short and already running.
Before the deadline even matters, one Florida-specific question often decides whether a lawsuit is available at all: whether the injury falls under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, known as NICA, a no-fault program that can be the exclusive remedy for certain severe neurological birth injuries. And every Florida medical malpractice case must clear the pre-suit requirements of Chapter 766, including a sworn opinion from a qualified medical expert, before a complaint can be filed.
This guide explains what to do now, how the deadlines actually work, and how current Florida law shapes what a birth injury claim can recover.
A birth injury claim is a medical malpractice action. It alleges that a provider — an obstetrician, a labor and delivery nurse, an anesthesiologist, or the hospital itself — failed to meet the prevailing professional standard of care, and that the failure caused harm to the child or the mother.
Not every difficult birth or adverse outcome is malpractice. Medicine carries inherent risk, and the legal question is narrower than “something went wrong.” It is whether a competent provider, facing the same circumstances, would have acted differently.
Answering that requires the complete medical records and review by a qualified medical expert, which is why these cases are records-and-experts intensive from day one.
The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, created under Fla. Stat. §§ 766.301 to 766.316 and known as NICA, is a no-fault administrative program. For births that qualify, NICA can be the exclusive remedy, meaning it bars a traditional civil malpractice suit and routes the family into a statutory benefits process instead. That makes it the first thing to check, not the last.
NICA applies narrowly. The statute reaches an infant who sustains a birth-related neurological injury: an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery resuscitation in a hospital, that renders the child permanently and substantially both mentally and physically impaired. Both impairments have to be present. An injury that affects only physical function, or only cognitive function, generally falls outside the plan.
Two things commonly take a case out of NICA. First, the participating physician or hospital must have given the patient the statutory pre-delivery notice that the provider participates in the plan; a failure to give that notice can preserve the right to sue. Second, the injury has to actually meet the statutory definition. Whether NICA controls is frequently the first and most consequential fight in a Florida birth injury case, and it turns on the specific facts.
The practical takeaway: do not assume NICA is your only option, and do not assume it is off the table. Both questions turn on documents — the delivery records and the notice paperwork from admission — that a lawyer should review before anyone files anything.
Have your child evaluated by a pediatric specialist who is not affiliated with the delivery hospital. An independent opinion protects your child’s health and creates a record made outside the institution whose care is in question. Keep a running list of every specialist your child sees.
You have a right to your records under Florida and federal law. Ask in writing for the complete file, not a summary, and specifically for the fetal heart rate monitoring strips and the mother’s prenatal records. That is often where the decisive timeline lives. You do not need to announce any legal plans to obtain records you are already entitled to.
Write down developmental concerns as they appear: feeding difficulties, seizures, missed milestones, the hours of specialized care you provide, and out-of-pocket costs for medication and equipment. Contemporaneous notes carry weight that reconstructed memory does not, and they document the day-to-day reality that non-economic damages are meant to address.
Florida medical malpractice claims generally must be brought within two years of when the injury was discovered, or should have been discovered, under Fla. Stat. § 95.11.
A point worth stating plainly: the 2023 tort reform law (HB 837) shortened the deadline for general negligence to two years, but medical malpractice was already two years, so that figure is unchanged. Most online guides that still cite four years are describing the old general-negligence rule, not malpractice.
A separate statute of repose generally bars claims more than four years after the incident, but Florida law extends protection for young children: a claim brought on behalf of a minor is generally not barred before the child’s eighth birthday, and proof that fraud or concealment hid the injury can extend the period further. These provisions interact in ways that depend entirely on your dates, so confirm your specific deadline with a lawyer rather than assuming the window is open or closed.
Florida once capped non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. The Florida Supreme Court struck those caps down — in the wrongful-death context in Estate of McCall v. United States (Fla. 2014) and in the personal-injury context in North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan (Fla. 2017).
As a result, there is currently no statutory cap on non-economic damages in Florida medical malpractice claims. Liability still turns on proof that the provider breached the prevailing professional standard of care — the central question in every malpractice case — established through testimony from a qualified medical expert.
Not every complication is negligence, but several conditions warrant a closer look at the care that preceded them.
A diagnosis on this list does not by itself prove malpractice. What matters is whether the medical team’s choices — the monitoring and response to fetal distress, the timing of a cesarean section, the use of delivery instruments — fell below the standard of care.
Florida medical malpractice cases follow a statutory pre-suit track set out in Chapter 766. Each step exists by law, not by firm preference.
The first step is a confidential review of the medical records and the family’s account. Viability is assessed here, before anything is filed and at no cost to the family.
Florida law requires a reasonable pre-suit investigation. Counsel retains a qualified medical expert, often a neonatologist or obstetrician, to review the records, and that expert must provide a verified written opinion that there are reasonable grounds to believe negligence occurred, under Fla. Stat. §§ 766.203 and 766.102. Without that corroborating opinion, the case cannot move forward.
Counsel serves a formal Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigation on each provider under Fla. Stat. § 766.106. That triggers a 90-day pre-suit period during which the providers and their insurers investigate the claim, and during which the statute of limitations is tolled. Some cases resolve within this window.
If the case does not resolve pre-suit, a complaint is filed and discovery begins: the exchange of records, staffing and policy documents, and sworn deposition testimony from the doctors and nurses involved. For a case filed in Tampa, that litigation proceeds in the Hillsborough County Circuit Court (13th Judicial Circuit) at the George Edgecomb Courthouse.
Most medical malpractice cases resolve before trial. The ones that resolve well, though, are the ones built as if they will be tried. A credible willingness to put the case before a jury is what moves a serious settlement offer.
A birth injury claim is built to fund a child’s needs over a lifetime. Recoverable losses generally fall into two categories.
These are the measurable costs. In catastrophic cases, attorneys work with life-care planners to project them: future medical and surgical care, ongoing physical, occupational, and speech therapy, assistive equipment and home modifications, and the child’s lost future earning capacity. Florida limits certain medical-damages evidence to amounts actually paid rather than amounts billed under Fla. Stat. § 768.0427, and how that rule applies in the medical malpractice context should be assessed case by case.
These cover the losses that are harder to quantify: the child’s pain, the loss of a normal life, and the toll on the family. As noted above, Florida no longer caps these damages in malpractice cases, but their value is proven through evidence, not assumed, which is one more reason the dated journal matters.
Direct, specific answers are a good sign. Vague references to “experience” without particulars are not.
Birth injury cases are usually tied to specific delivery hospitals and the physician groups that staff them. In Hillsborough County, that includes the high-volume labor and delivery services at Tampa General Hospital and the USF Health academic system. A firm that knows the local hospital systems, the 13th Judicial Circuit, and the obstetric and neonatology experts who testify in Florida cases can build the case more efficiently than one starting cold.
Plaintiff-side birth injury cases are typically handled on a contingency fee. The firm advances the substantial costs of expert review, records, and litigation, and is paid a percentage of any recovery rather than an hourly bill.
At John Bales Attorneys, that structure is described as “We Win Or You Pay Us Nothing.” Get the fee and cost terms in writing, and ask specifically what happens to advanced costs if there is no recovery.
The defense will often argue that the injury was an unavoidable complication, or a genetic or congenital condition, rather than a treatment failure. Countering that argument means showing, through the records and qualified expert testimony, exactly where the care deviated from accepted protocols — for example a delayed response to fetal distress visible on the monitoring strips.
Hospital systems retain experienced defense counsel and risk-management staff whose job is to limit exposure. Anticipating those tactics, and using Chapter 766 discovery to obtain the internal records that show what actually happened, is how a prepared firm holds a provider accountable.
Generally two years from when the injury was discovered or should have been discovered, under Fla. Stat. § 95.11, with separate repose rules that may extend the window for a young child. Because the calculation depends on your dates, confirm your specific deadline with a lawyer rather than assuming.
Florida’s discovery rule can delay the start of the filing period until the injury reasonably should have been discovered, and the minor’s repose provisions may apply. The interaction is fact specific, so do not assume the window has closed without checking.
Not necessarily. Most medical malpractice cases resolve before trial, often during or after the Chapter 766 pre-suit period. A case prepared for trial, though, tends to command a stronger resolution.
Possibly. If the injury fits the statutory definition of a birth-related neurological injury and the provider gave the required notice, the no-fault NICA program may be the exclusive remedy instead of a civil suit. Whether NICA applies is one of the first things a lawyer should evaluate.
About the Author — John Bales
John Bales is the principal of John Bales Attorneys, a plaintiff-side civil litigation firm with offices in Tampa, Sun City Center, and Melbourne Beach, Florida. Admitted to The Florida Bar in 1982, he is Board Certified in Business Litigation Law by The Florida Bar — the highest level of recognition The Florida Bar offers. He has been continuously selected to Florida Super Lawyers and holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He has served as President of the Hillsborough County Bar Association and Chair of the Grievance Committee for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit.
This article is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For advice on your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.
There's no fee for a case review and no obligation to hire us. Share a few details and a case manager will reach out within one business hour.